Charismatic Leadership Vs Transformational Leadership

What if we put charismatic leadership towards transformation leaders?

These two leadership styles really have a lot in common. Both of them depend on the influence and friendship. Leaders in both of these styles tend to participate in individuals in the organization for the purpose of achieving organizational goals. Both of these management styles have the goal of achieving the views and objectives of the organization.

The charismatic leader tends to rely on his popularity. One of the common symptoms of this is in the political state. Do you always remember Arnold Schwarzenegger? He is an amazing bodybuilder from Austria who became a popular film star. He made a lot of popular films, including The Terminator Thriller and Total Recall among others. He became very popular. That's why he won with the overwhelming majority when he ran as the California governor.

But charismatic leadership is not enough. A leader should show the characteristics of good leaders. This involves connecting followers and learning about their needs and concerns. When the leader learns about these needs and concerns, he has to do something to tend to them.

Charismatic leadership, to a certain extent, based on the Foreign Minister. He or she can easily refer to people and even associate them with bugs. Infrared can also become charismatic leaders, especially if they are believed by their followers. They often keep up with the number of trusted followers who act as communication. Thus, they also build their reputation.

Such a leadership can easily be misused. What if someone comes along and does the agency take away from his vision and task?

The result was confusion and conflict in the organization. While conflicts can sometimes be good in the organization, a swap competition may be the most painful to go through because the result is not a creativity but a division.

This is where the transformation leader comes in. In this case, someone who uses this style needs to influence his followers and subordinates to make important changes to their practices and their lives. The result is a better life for followers and better health for the organization.

We should not put charismatic leadership against transformational happiness because these two styles really add to each other. The leader needs to choose how to balance these two styles of leadership at the workplace.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *